Missing Narratives

This is about Proud Boys. I realize I may take some heat, but gossip, and left wing propaganda, clouds the truth, and I'd like to share some of it here. The Proud Boys, though not my cup of tea, may not be anywhere near what the left claims them to be. Half a century ago, they might be considered run of the mill western males and thus no need for such an organization with relatively the same expectations as society (personal responsibility, limited government, and stalwart patriotism). But it has been labelled as a white supremacist group when there is no evidence of such. I've searched and all I find is regurgitation of accusation and opinion. If you find something that clearly evidences white supremacy, please post a comment. FYI, just as some BLM violent criminals cannot be generalized to the organization, same as the Proud Boys. The CNN interview at the last link below shows how the left feels about any conservative group. And you saw a recent headline about a colored man w...

“Social justice is a concept of fair and just relations between the individual and society as measured by the distribution of wealth, opportunities for personal activity, and social privileges. ” The key terms in the above definition is "fair" and "just". Because "justice" and "just" are used, the statement forwards any inequality as a moral perpetration, and it provokes in us the need to blame as a key objective. As the concept was  socialized in public and private discourse, in the research journals, and the media, it took on a life of its own. It became a truism in the public mind that was self-evidencing and self-fulfilling.  As referenced above, the truth about the statistics is that they are all cause. This means true root cause or causes are unknown, and so there are potentially numerous causes. Unfortunately, this has not stopped politicians, news media, and the diversity industry from speculating causation. The seemingly final attributio...

Whether the following is true or not, the scientific community needs to stop being political. If a lab can reproduce the findings of the following controversial paper, under the strict supervision of a trusted entity that will destroy the product after it is reported, then they should. Only then will we know for sure whether the COVID-19 virus was manufactured, helped along to facilitate accelerated mutations using human trials, or actually came from Nature's kitchen. Because if it is true, then we are living under a threat so severe it makes Nagasaki and Hiroshima look like child's play. The preponderance of scientific literature I've been steeped in over the better part of the last two decades goes back nearly a century and documents how easily the Hitler phenomenon and Stanley Milgram phenomenon can occur en mass within society, infecting the public, politicians, business leaders, and especially the media. My own investigations finding repeating but unsubstantiated narra...

There will never be a study in favor of hydroxychloroquine the news doesn’t destroy simply because Trump pushed it (or perhaps other reasons, see below). Here’s CNN’s response to the Ford study favoring the early use of hydroxychloroquine: https://www.cnn.com/2020/07/02/health/hydroxychloroquine-coronavirus-detroit-study/index.html Sidebar: I just learned from a combat veteran hydroxychloroquine is or was given like candy as a prophylactic to U.S. combat personnel during deployment – not just for malaria. I downloaded the Ford study ( https://www.ijidonline.com/article/S1201-9712(20)30534-8/fulltext ). The CNN report was completely misleading. The methodology of the Ford study was solid and the medical protocols used were homogenous (medical practice across their hospitals was uniform). Also, the statistical analyses used were standard and their results significant. However, it was a retrospective study, meaning it wasn’t a controlled clinical trial. If you think that’s bad you...

If you’re a hater, just don’t read, don’t bother. The more I hear and read from haters the more my IQ drops. If you just disagree, fine, but if you think hatred won’t impact your intelligence you are naive. Psychologists calls that common phenomenon “The Emotional Dog and Its Rational Tail”. And the news is fueling it. You can also reference the blind men and the elephant story and the sophistry behind “secret combinations”.   You can go watch that part of the debate at this timeframe: 1:08:47 – 1:09:34 in the video at the URL below. https://youtu.be/fX79e-0RiRU   Wallace: “But are you willing tonight to condemn white supremacists and militia groups...” Trump: “Sure” Wallace: “…and to say that they need to stand down and not add to the violence in a number of these cities as we saw in Kenosha and as we’ve seen in Portland”. Simultaneously: Wallace: “Are you prepared to specifically … so what are what are you what are you saying?” Trump: “Sure I’m willing to ...

Consider these videos: https://youtu.be/cebFWOlx848 https://youtu.be/ebEkn-BiW5k Now consider Gustave Le Bon psychology on the group mind: "Le Bon's book on the crowd was first published in 1895. Le Bon influenced a plethora of dictators and demagogues, most notoriously, Goebbels, Hitler, and Mussolini.  "Simply by being part of the crowd, individuals lose all sense of self and all sense of responsibility. Once individual identity and the capability to control behavior disappears, crowd members become subject to contagion. That is, they are unable to resist any passing idea or, more particularly and because the intellect is all but obliterated, any passing emotion.  "Crowd members, Le Bon asserts, have descended several rungs on the ladder of civilization. They are barbarians [which] "possesses the spontaneity, the violence, the ferocity and also the enthusiasm of primitive beings" "The majority of his crowd text is, in fact, essentially a primer on ho...