The Communist Manifesto: The Computer Virus of the Mind

I can't remember the last (and only) time I read the Communist Manifesto by Karl Marx and Frederick Engels (wasn't married yet). But when I did I was certainly naïve. In fact, not only did it not seem all that interesting then given my interests and activities at the time, but I probably didn't really understand it. Maybe the ongoing education during the struggles of life, raising kids, and expanding one's perspective independently has a way of revealing pragma vs. vanity, a posteriori vs. a priori. I basically grew a bullshit-o-meter.

Having recently read it I have to say I didn't see before how twisted (and obsolete here) the involved ideas are, which with the author's apparent rancor and contempt smells a lot like Democrat Party rhetoric. Somehow the Democrats have been able to take obsolete nineteenth century proletariats vs. bourgeois contexts and forge class wars today, while ignoring the education disparity caused by a broken public education system.

The authors reveal negative biases that skew the relevance, veracity, and value of their ideas. But to the average reader it can seem more like some hidden evil they didn't know existed before that needs extermination. In beholding involved concepts against a backdrop of the plights of the poor and struggling, one could almost see its value. But that lure is a deception, and it seems to penetrate between the defective strings of human cognition like a computer virus for the mind.

Make no mistake, as the parents of the "First Lady of Facebook" know, communism is the persistent scourge of humanity - all thanks to a couple of broke and lazy morons, who, it would seem, was inspired by the devil in writing their infamous Communist Manifesto.

A couple of sources of the Communist Manifesto:

https://activistmanifesto.org/assets/original-communist-manifesto.pdf

https://www.marxists.org/admin/books/manifesto/Manifesto.pdf


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

You’re a Person of Color?

I like to begin with first and foremost, so... first and foremost, all people, not just people/person(s) of color (POC), can benefit from reading this. It is because whether we do or do not identify as a POC, we are all people - human beings with common and unique faults, strengths, and weaknesses. What do you do about the bias against you that you experience as a POC? So far, we’ve seen many movements and many efforts to raise awareness, demand justice, and all of that. But that’s not what I’m getting at. What I am asking is what are you doing about you?  Before I continue, I have a few thoughts to share. First, there are always two sides of every experience that seems racially biased: those experiencing the bias and those demonstrating it. Each side of such experiences has components that exist and components that do not exist, in isolation with the other. Such experiences are dynamic largely because of how we are wired to look at the world and how we are wired socially.  Be...
Read more

Risk If True Most Severe Ever

Whether the following is true or not, the scientific community needs to stop being political. If a lab can reproduce the findings of the following controversial paper, under the strict supervision of a trusted entity that will destroy the product after it is reported, then they should. Only then will we know for sure whether the COVID-19 virus was manufactured, helped along to facilitate accelerated mutations using human trials, or actually came from Nature's kitchen. Because if it is true, then we are living under a threat so severe it makes Nagasaki and Hiroshima look like child's play. The preponderance of scientific literature I've been steeped in over the better part of the last two decades goes back nearly a century and documents how easily the Hitler phenomenon and Stanley Milgram phenomenon can occur en mass within society, infecting the public, politicians, business leaders, and especially the media. My own investigations finding repeating but unsubstantiated narra...
Read more

New York Times Life-Long Romance With Communism

If I were the gatekeeper for who gets good or bad repute, I would want to give myself a good one under the auspice of modesty. Would not the newspaper of record, the New York Times, do the same? As is oft said, truth is sometimes too bizarre to be fabricated. And truth must be told as simply and as boldly as possible. We all studied history in school. If we were lucky, we had interest, a good textbook, and a non-boring teacher. But even if we had these three magic ingredients, we couldn’t possibly know what is not directly revealed in the history books. How could we read between lines that were not printed? All this came to mind as I pondered when the New York Times might have lost their way as the newspaper of record – the former noble journalist paradise where fact, not worldview, agenda, and spin ruled. As I revisited history anew, I began to doubt the New York Times ever truly earned such acclaimed magnanimity. It was obvious from my inquiry how powerful the pen was to change t...
Read more