Far-Right Group are Not Extremists - But Facebook wants you to think so

This is about Proud Boys. I realize I may take some heat, but gossip, and left wing propaganda, clouds the truth, and I'd like to share some of it here.

The Proud Boys, though not my cup of tea, may not be anywhere near what the left claims them to be. Half a century ago, they might be considered run of the mill western males and thus no need for such an organization with relatively the same expectations as society (personal responsibility, limited government, and stalwart patriotism).

But it has been labelled as a white supremacist group when there is no evidence of such. I've searched and all I find is regurgitation of accusation and opinion. If you find something that clearly evidences white supremacy, please post a comment. FYI, just as some BLM violent criminals cannot be generalized to the organization, same as the Proud Boys.

The CNN interview at the last link below shows how the left feels about any conservative group. And you saw a recent headline about a colored man who maimed and almost killed a white man who was not charged (again, more to learn about that story). What do you think this means for conservatives?

Back to the Proud Boys, who are in essence merely libertarians who are staunchly patriotic, if anything they might have done differently, it would be to not use the term "chauvinist".

A chauvinist by the traditional definition used in America means male supremacy, AKA male chauvinism. However, no use of the term by the group means racial supremacy. That is gleaned by thinking they are all white heterosexual males and all far right, but they are not.

The definition they are referring to something along the following as found in the Merriam-Webster dictionary: "undue partiality or attachment to a group or place to which one belongs or has belonged" and "excessive or blind patriotism". It means they pledge to be proud of and to be true to their Western country (guess no room for Eastern foreign nationals).

Some of them have gotten into violence with aggressive protestors. But so have members of Antifa and BLM. Catholics have killed protestants and protestants have killed Catholics - and not that long ago. Though one should probably give Antifa and BLM the same courtesy of not generalizing to all members that violence is expectable ... except both Antifa and BLM adhere to Marxism, which does advocate violence.

As Karl Marx himself put it, “there is only one way in which the murderous death agonies of the old society and the bloody birth throes of the new society can be shortened, simplified and concentrated, and that way is revolutionary terror.”

Again, Proud Boys are not my cup of tea. However, I share similar views in that I believe that government should be limited in their power especially to oppress freedoms, and I am patriotic and true to the U.S.A. I believe violence should be completely avoided except when it is required to stop one from committing violence against another. In fact, such is the belief of all of the warfighters I have worked with.

https://drrichswier.com/2020/10/10/western-chauvinists-are-not-white-supremacists/

https://tinyurl.com/y595e8rc

https://tinyurl.com/ycslrb6r

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

You’re a Person of Color?

I like to begin with first and foremost, so... first and foremost, all people, not just people/person(s) of color (POC), can benefit from reading this. It is because whether we do or do not identify as a POC, we are all people - human beings with common and unique faults, strengths, and weaknesses. What do you do about the bias against you that you experience as a POC? So far, we’ve seen many movements and many efforts to raise awareness, demand justice, and all of that. But that’s not what I’m getting at. What I am asking is what are you doing about you?  Before I continue, I have a few thoughts to share. First, there are always two sides of every experience that seems racially biased: those experiencing the bias and those demonstrating it. Each side of such experiences has components that exist and components that do not exist, in isolation with the other. Such experiences are dynamic largely because of how we are wired to look at the world and how we are wired socially.  Be...
Read more

Risk If True Most Severe Ever

Whether the following is true or not, the scientific community needs to stop being political. If a lab can reproduce the findings of the following controversial paper, under the strict supervision of a trusted entity that will destroy the product after it is reported, then they should. Only then will we know for sure whether the COVID-19 virus was manufactured, helped along to facilitate accelerated mutations using human trials, or actually came from Nature's kitchen. Because if it is true, then we are living under a threat so severe it makes Nagasaki and Hiroshima look like child's play. The preponderance of scientific literature I've been steeped in over the better part of the last two decades goes back nearly a century and documents how easily the Hitler phenomenon and Stanley Milgram phenomenon can occur en mass within society, infecting the public, politicians, business leaders, and especially the media. My own investigations finding repeating but unsubstantiated narra...
Read more

New York Times Life-Long Romance With Communism

If I were the gatekeeper for who gets good or bad repute, I would want to give myself a good one under the auspice of modesty. Would not the newspaper of record, the New York Times, do the same? As is oft said, truth is sometimes too bizarre to be fabricated. And truth must be told as simply and as boldly as possible. We all studied history in school. If we were lucky, we had interest, a good textbook, and a non-boring teacher. But even if we had these three magic ingredients, we couldn’t possibly know what is not directly revealed in the history books. How could we read between lines that were not printed? All this came to mind as I pondered when the New York Times might have lost their way as the newspaper of record – the former noble journalist paradise where fact, not worldview, agenda, and spin ruled. As I revisited history anew, I began to doubt the New York Times ever truly earned such acclaimed magnanimity. It was obvious from my inquiry how powerful the pen was to change t...
Read more