COVID Saga: NIAID, Gates, Soros, Wuhan Lab, Remdesivir, Hydroxychloroquine

There will never be a study in favor of hydroxychloroquine the news doesn’t destroy simply because Trump pushed it (or perhaps other reasons, see below).

Here’s CNN’s response to the Ford study favoring the early use of hydroxychloroquine: https://www.cnn.com/2020/07/02/health/hydroxychloroquine-coronavirus-detroit-study/index.html

Sidebar: I just learned from a combat veteran hydroxychloroquine is or was given like candy as a prophylactic to U.S. combat personnel during deployment – not just for malaria.

I downloaded the Ford study (https://www.ijidonline.com/article/S1201-9712(20)30534-8/fulltext). The CNN report was completely misleading. The methodology of the Ford study was solid and the medical protocols used were homogenous (medical practice across their hospitals was uniform). Also, the statistical analyses used were standard and their results significant.

However, it was a retrospective study, meaning it wasn’t a controlled clinical trial. If you think that’s bad you should look into how much medical advice you get based on studies that were not clinical trials. For instance, the metabolic syndrome theory is based on such a study with waist measurement as the primary marker. But it didn’t stop the Air Force from using that to kick people out.

The real hypocrisy is the studies behind the FDA revoking its EU authorization were also retrospective. You didn't get that in the CNN news report.

The Ford study deviated from most in that the patients were all treated early, and they didn’t just take the death certificate on face value.

They manually reviewed each death to confirm COVID-19 as the primary cause of death. This is where this study breaks from many of the other studies and most death reporting. At one time I pulled in some numbers and crunched them and found as much as half of the COVID-19 deaths reported might not have had COVID-19 as primary cause. That means if the 200,000 deaths were manually inspected, the real COVID-19 caused deaths could be as low as 100,000, about 20-25% higher than estimated flu deaths last year if there no vaccine (I used CDC data from their website, but those pages were replaced with new pages and different information).

Regarding those studies against hydroxychloroquine, I looked up the CDC’s page referring to the FDA removal of its EU authorization. You can find more about that here: https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/69/wr/mm6935a4.htm

I downloaded the data and the studies supporting it and I noticed Chinese names in all the studies, which is irrelevant unless they are in China and their work was financed at least in part by China. They were.

That is interesting. Why? Because early on a drug called Remdesivir was competing with hydroxychloroquine, and the Wuhan Institute of Virology applied for a patent for Remdesivir in January. Here’s the additional details (you can go check these out with FDA and SEC filings): The lab received funding from us (NIAID, Gates) but also George Soros. Yes, George Soros, the “right’s favorite conspiracy theory”. You know why they say that? Because they know most of you won’t go see for yourself – that’s too much work.

It is no secret George Soros favors socialism, but with more data one can see he wants the world to become communist. Moreover, you can trace donations to the DNC and Dem candidates, as well as newspapers from the George Soros foundation and others he finances – and his children (re: FEC and SEC filings). The left’s lone wolf apologists abound that downplay this, have come up with fairytales to explain it.

Then there’s’ things financed in cash like thugs in the riots who were Antifa or dressed as Antifa.

Sounds like a James Bond film, huh?

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

You’re a Person of Color?

I like to begin with first and foremost, so... first and foremost, all people, not just people/person(s) of color (POC), can benefit from reading this. It is because whether we do or do not identify as a POC, we are all people - human beings with common and unique faults, strengths, and weaknesses. What do you do about the bias against you that you experience as a POC? So far, we’ve seen many movements and many efforts to raise awareness, demand justice, and all of that. But that’s not what I’m getting at. What I am asking is what are you doing about you?  Before I continue, I have a few thoughts to share. First, there are always two sides of every experience that seems racially biased: those experiencing the bias and those demonstrating it. Each side of such experiences has components that exist and components that do not exist, in isolation with the other. Such experiences are dynamic largely because of how we are wired to look at the world and how we are wired socially.  Be...
Read more

Risk If True Most Severe Ever

Whether the following is true or not, the scientific community needs to stop being political. If a lab can reproduce the findings of the following controversial paper, under the strict supervision of a trusted entity that will destroy the product after it is reported, then they should. Only then will we know for sure whether the COVID-19 virus was manufactured, helped along to facilitate accelerated mutations using human trials, or actually came from Nature's kitchen. Because if it is true, then we are living under a threat so severe it makes Nagasaki and Hiroshima look like child's play. The preponderance of scientific literature I've been steeped in over the better part of the last two decades goes back nearly a century and documents how easily the Hitler phenomenon and Stanley Milgram phenomenon can occur en mass within society, infecting the public, politicians, business leaders, and especially the media. My own investigations finding repeating but unsubstantiated narra...
Read more

New York Times Life-Long Romance With Communism

If I were the gatekeeper for who gets good or bad repute, I would want to give myself a good one under the auspice of modesty. Would not the newspaper of record, the New York Times, do the same? As is oft said, truth is sometimes too bizarre to be fabricated. And truth must be told as simply and as boldly as possible. We all studied history in school. If we were lucky, we had interest, a good textbook, and a non-boring teacher. But even if we had these three magic ingredients, we couldn’t possibly know what is not directly revealed in the history books. How could we read between lines that were not printed? All this came to mind as I pondered when the New York Times might have lost their way as the newspaper of record – the former noble journalist paradise where fact, not worldview, agenda, and spin ruled. As I revisited history anew, I began to doubt the New York Times ever truly earned such acclaimed magnanimity. It was obvious from my inquiry how powerful the pen was to change t...
Read more